tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7349257421667969689.post5948241457258238006..comments2009-07-05T08:59:07.141-04:00John Nortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01252665097539551066jnorton@osv.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7349257421667969689.post-26452087502341338842009-07-04T19:00:15.474-04:002009-07-04T19:00:15.474-04:00Exactly, Clayton. If it's a matter of religious faith then it is easy for him to dismiss it. Or perhaps call it "old thinking and worn argument."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7349257421667969689.post-54379959951217822932009-07-03T09:36:09.157-04:002009-07-03T09:36:09.157-04:00Who gave the President the impression that the Church's teaching on contraception was a matter of religious faith, rather than natural law?Claytonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01442791960391683444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7349257421667969689.post-47170413863083087382009-07-02T22:49:42.780-04:002009-07-02T22:49:42.780-04:00There is something very unsettling about the term "irreconcilable differences". It seems to thwart dialogue and stagnate research. It entrenches opposing viewpoints and impedes the light of our collective intellect from the sight of objective truth... a goal we should constantly strive towards.Patrickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02203171715700597265noreply@blogger.com