"But Benedict’s encyclical is nothing if not political. 'Caritas in Veritate' promotes a vision of economic solidarity rooted in moral conservatism. It links the dignity of labor to the sanctity of marriage. It praises the redistribution of wealth while emphasizing the importance of decentralized governance. It connects the despoiling of the environment to the mass destruction of human embryos.Well said. Read the full column, "The Audacity of the Pope," by clicking HERE.
This is not a message you’re likely to hear in Barack Obama’s next State of the Union, or in the Republican Party’s response. It represents a kind of left-right fusionism with little traction in American politics...
Why should being pro-environment preclude being pro-life? Why can’t Republicans worry about economic inequality, and Democrats consider devolving more power to localities and states? Does opposing the Iraq war mean that you have to endorse an anything-goes approach to bioethics? Does supporting free trade require supporting the death penalty?
These questions, and many others like them, are the kind that a healthy political system would allow voters and politicians to explore.
But for now, at least, you’re more likely to find them being raised in Benedict XVI’s Vatican than in Barack Obama’s Washington."
Card. Ruini will head a study of Medjugorje
1 hour ago



1 comments:
Mary, I haven't read the longer article yet, but you've hit on some hot points for me here alone. I no longer feel I can identify with either major political party because of how they polarize one another. I am in complete agreement with the questions you've raised and have raised them myself, and I think that if we're ever to make true progress regarding a better world, we ought to start there, and not with more division. Both camps have great ideas. Why not merge the best of both, focusing on the dignity of the human being, generosity, kindness -- those basic elements of a workable humanity. I think if the premise were redefined in this way, we'd make more progress more quickly. Thanks for saying it so "to the point."
Post a Comment