by Monsignor Owen F. Campion UPDATED:
Notre Dame University’s recent decision to invite President Obama to address its forthcoming Commencement Exercises and to confer upon him an honorary degree caused an outcry from many Catholics opposed to the Chief Executive’s policies regarding abortion and stem cell research.
The fury transferred in many cases to “the bishops”, assuming that either the bishop of the diocese in which Notre Dame is located could stop the whole thing, or the American bishops collectively could do something.
Actually, the bishops have spoken. Several years ago, as a group, they formally resolved that Catholic colleges and universities should not invite politicians with pro-abortion records to speak on their campuses, nor should these schools give awards or honorary degrees to such political figures.
Nevertheless, the President will not be the first such figure to be lauded by an American university with a Catholic heritage. Not that long ago, the University of San Francisco, founded by the Jesuits in 1855, honored Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, whose pro-abortion views also dismay many Catholics.
To understand the situation, it is better to characterize these schools properly. There is utterly no comparison between them and the local parochial school.
This does not ignore certain Catholic symbols, or practices, in these universities, nor the often stated references in mission statements and even in specific policies to their “Catholic character” or “mission”. Rather, it recognizes other important facts.
As the Catholic community formed in the United States in the early 1800s, Catholic missionaries arrived from Europe, founding many institutions. For example, in 1789, the Jesuits started Catholic higher education by founding Georgetown College, on the outskirts of what was to become the national capital.
In 1842, a French community of men Religious, the Congregation of Holy Cross, started the school in Northern Indiana that eventually became the University of Notre Dame du Lac, to refer to Notre Dame by its official name.
Always, these Religious congregations owned and operated the schools that they had established. Even then, however, Church law gave local bishops limited jurisdiction over what happened in these schools. Why? The Religious communities in most cases were not subject to local bishops, only to their own superiors, and finally to the Pope, a fact of longstanding Church law.
Things began to change midway in the 20th Century. Vocations to Religious congregations began to fall, just as enrollments skyrocketed.
Religious communities correctly knew that soon they would not have the personnel to teach in, and to administer, these schools, at previous levels.
Then, philosophically, at the same time, the Church expressly was emphasizing lay witness. The Second Vatican Council extensively built on Pope Pius XI’s concerted push for “Catholic Action”. Bringing people other than Religious or priests into decision-making was the ideal, something the Church clearly was advocating.
So, in the 1960s, the founding Religious communities formally transferred ownership of, and rights to control, many of these famous universities to non-Church corporations which impaneled boards, overwhelmingly peopled not by Religious but by others, not reporting to the Church, to run the schools.
Now, in almost all the major universities historically Catholic, these boards set school policies and hire, and direct, college officials, very few of whom are priests or Religious, at times not Catholics.
When push comes to shove, without any truly sovereign place in the statutes of these institutions, the Religious, the bishops, and even the Vatican, only can make their case for attention to the school’s Catholic heritage, as they see it, and then hope for the best. When controversies occur at these schools, it hardly necessarily follows that Church officials either have coalesced in, or ignored, any decision.
Protesting decisions at universities such as this action at Notre Dame by appealing to bishops, rather than to those who actually operate these schools, overlooks fact.
Monsignor Campion is Associate Publisher of Our Sunday Visitor and Editor of The Priest magazine.




18 comments:
Good point and good article.
I would not downplay the role of religious themselves in the development of what some universities have become, however. At USF for instance, which you mentioned, there are 13 members of the Society of Jesus on the board. Being the most informed members of the board and receiving deference as Jesuits, they do effectively control the University. The Jesuit President certainly backed Pelosi's appearance, as he did Mayor Gavin Newsom's before her. It appears to be the case as well at Notre Dame that the honor to President Obama is backed by the Holy Cross Father President.
Still, it is true that historically the religious are not responsible to the local ordinary. I don't think that has played out well. There should be some responsibility to the local ordinary. The very definition of a local church centers on the person of the local bishop.
Good to see this informed comment to the invitation NOT the moral issue. Here I've learnt that the Catholic church has no jurisdiction to over-rule the decision.
'Prolifers' have the right to protest (and not just Catholic)- go ahead.PL's protest a President who is not the first President or controversial figure to speak at Notre Dame.
PL's have given themselves the insult and now respond as the 'morally wounded'.
It’s certainly not the first time a pro-abortion figure has addressed a Catholic university. (Cardinal Newman Society)
Emily Toates,Notre Dame Right to Life, said the groups weren’t attacking the president but opposing his stance on abortion: “it’s an issue of respect of human life, and our Catholic character.” No it's not - he's not attacking Catholics.
Bishop D’Arcy said he would miss commencement for the first time in his 25 years. “I wish no disrespect to our president, I pray for him and wish him well”
That's how to protest -not ask for the invitation to be withdrawn. PL's disagree with the invite. OK - protest the decision not the man. Show some respect or need I say it - TOLERANCE - to views other than your own. It's easy to tolerate people you agree with.
D'Arcy said ND has chosen "prestige over truth" -Catholic truth.
Obama welcomes the "spirit of debate and healthy disagreement on important issues."
Now that's a President.
Notre Dame President Rev. John Jenkins said this week the university did not support all of Obama's policies but that it hoped to engage him in discussion. Sensible debate can flow if many PL’s learn what your President means by: the "false choice" between sound science and moral values.
THIS ARTICLE IS AS SINUOUS AS A WEASEL CLIMBING A FLAG POLE. WHAT IE COMPLETELY OVERLOOKS IS THE CANONICAL ROLE OF THE BISHOP REGARDING A CATHOLC INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING.
THE BISHOPS BOTH COLLECTIVELY AND INDIVIDUALLY FORSOOK THEIR CANONICAL AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBIILTY REGARDING SUCH INSTITUIONS. THEY CONTINUED TO PUBLICLY ESTEEM THEM AS BONA FIDE CATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS WHILE LEAVING THEM ENTIRELY AT LIBERTY TO PURSUE THEIR OWN DESTINY ENROBED IN AN "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" POLICY WHICH IMMUNIZED THEM AGAINST ALL AUTHENTIC ECCLESIAL AUTHORITY.
WHAT THIS ARTICLE COMPLETELY ELIDES IS THE ROLE THE BISHOPS PLAYED IN ALLOWING THESE INSTITUTIONS TO FUNCTION UNDER THE GUISE OF "CATHOLIC" INSTITUTIONS AS THEY DELIBERATELY NEGLECTED AND ESCHEWED FROM THEIR EPISCOPAL AGENDA ANY SERIOUS PROGRAM TO DEAL WITH THEM EFFICACIOIUSLY.
NOW, IT IS A PUBLIC NEWS ITEM THAT THE RUN-OF-THE-MILL CATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING ARE PSEUDO-CATHOLIC AS ARE SO MANY OF OUR PUBLIC "CATHOLIC: LEADERS IN CONGRESS.
PRAYERFULLY AND CORDIALLY YOURS,
RICHARD E. DUMONT, PH.D., OCDS
The president was invited specifically by FATHER Jenkins.
Most commencement speakers are either invited or approved by the college presidents who are typically Catholic PRIESTS who have a vow of obedience to the pope and the Magisterium.
There is also a canonical role for the local bishop. Your article is a nice history lesson but not relevant. All the local bishop needs to do is declare Notre Dame NOT CATHOLIC as was done at some lesser schools over the years and you'll find out how strong a reaction you get.
So then, Catholic universities are not really Catholic at all. It's a charade that has been played on Catholics who have contributed substantial sums of money over the years to these universities, thinking they were supporting higher learning with Catholic higher morals.
This scam must end! It's an abuse of the holy names of Catholics' most revered holy personages, such as Our Lady.
My suggestion is for Catholics to wake up and cease all monetary contributions to these not-really-Catholic institutions. It would be better to donate that money to a Pro-Life charity such as Human Life International.
With all said & done...the President of Notre Dame doesn't seem to care what the Bishops said & I truly feel the Bishops SHOULD HALT Obama from giving the commencement address! He is so very pro death of the unborn! How could one want a man who said if his daughters make a mistake, ABORTION is available!
I URGE the graduates not to ATTEND their own commencement...that would show the world where they stand!!!
I agree that the Catholic identity shoul NOT be ascribed to schools who are tolerant of obviously anti-catholic persons or events. They are trying to eat their cake and have it too by pretending to unsuspecting donors that they honor catholic traditions. I hope these donors support more worthy enterprises. As an aside, healthy debate is appropriate to subjects for which there is a grey area, not abortion or embryonic stemm cells!!!
@Craig:
I don't believe Emily Toates meant that President Obama is attacking Catholics. Rather, her point is that as a University, supposedly having a Catholic character, the University should not honor a man who promotes a policy contrary to the Catholic teaching on the fundamental right to life. Abortion is intrinsically evil and those in politics who don't work toward righting this grave moral wrong, should not be honored.
Students at Notre Dame who are protesting the invitation for President Obama to speak at our commencement are not being intolerant of his views. We, in fact, would be in strong support of engaging in dialogue with those with opposing views, especially on abortion. However, honoring the President at commencement is in no way a dialogue, but rather a platform for him. We cannot stand up and applaud and honor a man who does not defend the unborn, but who is rather, the most anti-life president in our nation's history. We are, therefore, upset that the President of our University has put us in this position, especially on a day that should be ours.
-Notre Dame Senior, Class of 09'
@ Notre Dame Senior, Class of '09:
Thankyou for your reply. I think you are totally 'intolerant to his (Obama's) views' and that is a legitimate position to take. "Abortion is intrinsically evil and those in politics who don't work toward righting this grave moral wrong, should not be honored."
By tolerance I mean of the man and the right of ND to invite him.
You said it here:"We want to emphasize that we are not attacking the office of the president, but taking issue with his moral stances." Good for you!
But you aren't finished yet! Where is your right to protest? "We cannot sit by idly while the university honors someone who believes that an entire class of human beings is undeserving of the most basic of all legal rights, the right to live." (Now I hear some righteous indignation.)
The students asserted that the university's president, Father John Jenkins, "has placed some of his students in a moral dilemma as to whether they should attend their own graduation." OK - so now you have a 'dilemma' - hold on - says who? - a bit of lateral thinking here - you have an opprtunity!
"Many pro-life seniors along with their families, are conflicted about whether to participate in the commencement ceremony."
(This is the statement that prompted me to write in the first place)
I have now read your more detailed plans on Catholic Online. The student groups affirmed, "In response to the university's decision, we pledge ourselves to acts of witness that will be characterized by respect, prayerfulness, outspoken fidelity to the Church, and true concern for the good of our university." 'The groups committed to host academic and religious events in order to engage the university community.' Hold on! - what happened to the graduation?; the single most symbolic event in all of this.
"Many pro-life seniors and their families, are conflicted about whether to participate in the commencement ceremony." Don't be! -this is the opportunity! This is YOUR graduation. ATTEND - with your heads held high. You have worked for it. You deserve it. You can come away with more memories than just receiving your degrees. (If the President was going to be handing it to you that would be different)
You go in the face of Father Jenkins' decision and make a stand to demonstrate your belief as an 'act of witness' and 'OUTSPOKEN fidelity to the Church'. You will receive wide media coverage of your actions and the reason for them. When President Obama stands to give his address, "We cannot stand up and applaud" - exactly correct! - you stand up and do NOT applaud. You stand as a group and turn your back. Now you stay completely silent until he finishes. Then you turn around and sit down. This is a recognised sign of disagreement with a person's position. It tells the man strongly his view has the coalition's "deepest opposition". You wear a badge on stage to receive your degree that says: 'I'm Pro-life!' Your parents and friends wear them too. You each turn to the audience after receiving your degree and say, in a loud proud confident voice, I'm Pro-life!"
"We are upset . . . our University has put us in this position . . . a day that should be ours." So SEIZE THE DAY!
You will have many more hard times ahead to stand up for your beliefs - this is just one.
This is the appropriate time and place to show "true concern for the good of our university."
Not everyone gets the chance to 'bear witness' in front of their President.
(. . . . . . but that's just me)
PS: I've re-read the blogs.
I now understand this is not your graduation but 'commencement' - a celebration I am not familiar with in Australia.
Also my "TOLERANCE - to views other than your own" should have read "TOLERANCE - to people with views other than your own"
Sorry for that confusion.
As Bishop D’Arcy said:“I wish no disrespect to our president, I pray for him and wish him well”
As for my quote: 'It's easy to tolerate people you agree with.'
Go easy on the person - go in hard on his view. (The old 'I disagree most strongly with your position but will defend your right to do so.')
With all due respect, I do not agree that there's nothing the Vatican and the Bishops can do but stand back and "hope for the best." ND uses the name "Catholic" to raise funds. It is sadly true that the current student body is more liberal than the alumni base (an inevitable result of the short sighted transferral of responsibility to a lay board and the ensuing hiring of non Catholic faculty).
Let's see how quickly things turn around when alumni stop sending in money to ND until they shape up. That would work more wonders than the Vatican ever could.
And by the way, ND is run by a priest, Father John Jenkins. As a priest, he is not free to disobey the instructions of the Bishops with regards to pro-death politicians speaking at and being honored by the university under his care.
What planet are you from? Look behind the veneer of the grade schools. They have kids at the school whose parents are not even married. They have some nuns that don't believe in the hierarchy of the male dominated church. They have all kinds of teachers of all walks of life. Some even handing out comunion. They have large contributors whose children get to do whatever they want. Kids when they are in 8th grade and high school see through it even if the parents do not. Some people are "converting" just their children so they can get a coveted spot in that well trained Catholic high school. Taking a spot from a catholic boy with the B-. We have libral press in catholic high school newspapers representing non catholic views and having optional masses because we don't want to inconveinence the other faiths at the school. You have the support staff at some of the parishes being power hungry gossips running unsupervised and just glad to have a warm body answering the phones. You have priests that don't know the peoples names in their parish unless they are major contributors or Readers. You could be crying outside on your church steps and no parishioner or even a priest walking by will attempt to assist? Do you know the names of the people who sit in the pew in front and back of you every Sunday? Does the community care if you lost your job or your son is in trouble? I have lived in 3 states visited many more some people are lucky and have that 1 in 20 that is a giving loving community where the pastor is constantly yelling to stop all gossip and he knows your name. Most parishes you can not get a mass said for a dying aunt until 3 months from now you have to come in when they have office hours on your work day to the church office to get the mass said for your dying Aunt. ND lost a student and did not find them until the following spring when the lake thawed. That is more appaling then who talks at the school. ND had never prosecuted a male student for rape. In fact their policy implied that it would just be you said versus he said. Other catholic colleges say if you maybe raped someone you are out. This was just 5 years ago when I thoroughly was checking out the school for my daughter. ND has much bigger problems than who speaks at their school. The extreme proverty of the surrounding neighborhood for another. ,,,, emphasize service and know every student and the rest will follow... God is in Everyone make sure we are taking care of him and them. PEACE!
When I read that the founding religious communities formally transferred their ownership rights to lay boards, the first thing that came to my mind was the recent State Bill 1098 in Connecticut, which tried to force the transfer of oversight of parish finances and decisions from bishops and parish priests to the lay boards in CT.
In retrospect, the transfer of ownership at Catholic universities seems like a great mistake to me. I've read recently that Boston College leadership decided to place the crucifixes back into classrooms, and this provoked an outcry from non-Christian faculty members such as the Chair of the Chemistry Department, opposing the measure. How did we ever come to this point? Why have non-Christian faculties who oppose the crucifixes been hired in the first place, at a "Catholic" higher ed institution?
It is time to learn from our past mistakes, and transfer those universities and colleges back to the religious communities. If the religious congregations decided to voluntarily transfer ownership to laypeople, let the laypeople voluntarily transfer ownership back to the religious communities now. Let those communities run the institutions in a way that's fully obedient to their superiors and to the Pope. Let them only ever hire and keep on their payrolls laypeople who are truly Catholic. We do not need faculty members who are offended by the crucifix, or the ones who embrace the culture of death and gay agendas, at Catholic colleges and universities. I know this goes against the usual norms of being politically correct and having tenured faculty members who are so cemented in their positions, they cannot be removed even if they embrace every single sinful and un-Catholic trend out there. No problem. Catholic higher ed institutions need not and should not play by the rules of secular institutions. Being Catholics, obedience to the teaching authority of our Church must trump academic freedom any day. Catholic higher ed institutions shouldn't worry about being un-PC, but they must worry about staying truly Catholic.
"The fury transferred in many cases to “the bishops”, assuming that either the bishop of the diocese in which Notre Dame is located could stop the whole thing, or the American bishops collectively could do something."
What can American bishops collectively do? How about pay attention to this:
Pope John Paul II's encyclical, Veritatis Splendor, 116:
"We have the duty, as Bishops, to be vigilant that the word of God is faithfully taught. My Brothers in the Episcopate, it is part of our pastoral ministry to see to it that this moral teaching is faithfully handed down and to have recourse to appropriate measures to ensure that the faithful are guarded from every doctrine and theory contrary to it. In carrying out this task we are all assisted by theologians; even so, theological opinions constitute neither the rule nor the norm of our teaching. Its authority is derived, by the assistance of the Holy Spirit and in communion cum Petro et sub Petro, from our fidelity to the Catholic faith which comes from the Apostles. As Bishops, we have the grave obligation to be personally vigilant that the ``sound doctrine'' (1 Tim 1:10) of faith and morals is taught in our Dioceses.
A particular responsibility is incumbent upon Bishops with regard to Catholic institutions. Whether these are agencies for the pastoral care of the family or for social work, or institutions dedicated to teaching or health care, Bishops can canonically erect and recognize these structures and delegate certain responsibilities to them. Nevertheless, Bishops are never relieved of their own personal obligations. It falls to them, in communion with the Holy See, both to grant the title ``Catholic'' to Church- related schools,[179] universities,[180] health-care facilities and counselling services, and, in cases of a serious failure to live up to that title, to take it away."
Dear Bishops, there is something that can be done. Don't confuse the faithful who send their sons and daughters to seemingly Catholic Universities only to find out the truth after our children's faith and morals are stripped away, the schools are Catholic in their Heritage ONLY. What's in a name? In this case, everything!
MarinaBlues in California
Dear Msgr. Campion,
I am sure your column is offered with the best of intentions, and is not in general terms false, but when it comes down the specifics of this situation a quick look at the facts (always in order) shows a different story.
Its quite true that of the 55 members of the Board of Trustees only 6 odd are priests, 5 CSCs and Bishop Jenky, formerly a CSC. A quick look at the
Charter and Statutes of the college will show you that the Trustees have no power that is not given them by the "Fellows of the University," of which at all times one half are CSCs. Thus to pass the buck to the lay folk is not quite fair.
Furthermore, if I remember my Canon Law right, since it is no longer run solely by religious, it does not enjoy the priveledges of a Religious Order of Pontifical Rite. The university established by its statutes as a private association of the faithful can be supressed by the local ordinary (Can. 326 §1). And cannot even call itself Catholic without his consent (Can. 808). And since according to its own bi-laws the clerical members must be clerics the six Clerical Fellows would be obliged by Canon Law to obey.
The fact of the matter is that Notre Dame is run by 12 fellows 6 of whom must be priests and are subject to Canon Law.
The problem is that the only tools offered by Canon Law are the radical tools. Canon Law presumes that Religious will be obedient and cooperate with the Local Ordinary. If not they and their order can I believe be asked to leave a diocese. Sadly bishops are not willing to use the tools of power given to them to protect and lead their flocks. Until they are the American Church and the Church throughout the world will remain rudderless.
It is time for all Catholics to stop funding these charades known as Catholic universities . It may be a good thing this has been in the news . There are many bona fide Catholic Universities that are loyal to the Holy Father . It should be looked into before applying to a so called Catholic College. Eble United States
It is a tragedy that Fr. Jenkins and his liberal friends have so willingly sold-out the values, morals, and fundamental teaching of the Catholic Church. Obama needs Notre Dame more than Notre Dame needs Obama. I hope the benefactors will direct their monetary gifts this year to a truly Catholic cause by visiting www.oltiv.org and supporting the Our Lady of America devotion by helping to preserve the beautiful chapels and grounds where these apparitions took place in 1956. It is actually only 45 miles from the Notre Dame campus.
Heed Our Lady's call to purity. Read the messages and warnings of Our Lady of America at www.oltiv.org
Well the 'Class of 09' is certainly on the map! Now how about some constructive suggestions and support for their situation?
I would have thought there would be some spiritual and biblical guidance given to them by now.
They seem to be the forgotten group in all of this. Yes it's great so many see this as a 'call to action' - and the first focus surely is the commencement ceremony.
Post a Comment